Base Closures & Walter Reed Hospital
I absolutely cannot believe this. Supposedly, we're fighting The War On Terror and contuining our "mission" in Operation Iraqi Freedom for at least another four years; my question however is this: how in the heck are we going to do all that if we close our country's bases? We can't. Our forefathers are probably rolling over in their grave and I can understand why. All these base closures are going to achieve is some supposed "savings," for the Pentagon; while the American Armed Forces and American Citizens suffer the REAL and FRIGTHENING consequences. Closure of the bases will only provide greater access to the Terrorists and THEIR mission to destory America. I thought President Bush's stance was "you're either with us, or against us?" I'm sorry Mr. Presdient, but it seems that you and your Administration are again U.S.-the United States, and are only out for your own personal gain. What a travesty!
MSNBC.com
Base panel turns attention to Air Force Commission earlier agreed with Pentagon to close Walter Reed hospital
The Associated Press
Updated: 3:27 p.m. ET Aug. 25, 2005
WASHINGTON - A federal commission weighing military base closures turned its attention to the Air Force Thursday afternoon, after a morning session in which it voted to close the crown jewel of Army hospitals.
The nine-member panel was set to conclude its work by voting on the Pentagon's proposals for the Air Force, arguably the most contentious of the group, after it steamrolled through hundreds of Pentagon proposals Wednesday following four months of study and preparation.
In its first business Thursday, the panel agreed with the Pentagon on closing down Walter Reed Army Medical Center, a Washington, D.C., institution that has treated presidents and foreign leaders as well as veterans and soldiers, including those returning from the Iraq war.
Under the Pentagon plan, the hospital’s staff and services would move from Walter Reed’s historic main post to the National Naval Medical Center in nearby Bethesda, Md., to create an expanded facility, as well as a regional hospital at Fort Belvoir in Virginia.
The Pentagon calls this “jointness” — the services combining their strengths rather than working separately. Walter Reed’s care is considered first-rate but the facility is showing its age, the commission found.
“Kids coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan, all of them in harm’s way, deserve to come back to 21st-century medical care,” Commission Chairman Anthony Principi said Thursday. “It needs to be modernized.”
One-time costs, including construction and renovations, would total $989 million. The Pentagon would save $301 million over 20 years, the commission said. The expanded facility would be renamed Walter Reed. The current hospital has about 185 beds, but the expanded facility would have 340.
The commission also voted to close the Brooks City-Base in Texas, which is home to the School of Aerospace Medicine. Tang, the orange drink created for astronauts, was developed at the base in the 1960s. The medical school will relocate to Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio.
Early end to votingAs he gaveled open the hearing, Principi said he expected to finish voting no later than Friday, a day earlier than planned. The commission must send its final report to President Bush by Sept. 8.
The president can accept it, reject it, or send it back to the commission for revisions. Congress also will have a chance to veto the plan in its entirety but it has not taken that step in four previous rounds of base closings. If ultimately approved, the changes would occur over the next six years.
With communities around the country awaiting word anxiously, the panel breezed through Army and Navy proposals Wednesday, deciding even high-profile issues, such as saving a submarine base in Connecticut and a shipyard in Maine, in less than an hour.
The panel agreed with proposals to shutter hundreds of small and large facilities in all corners of the country, and, ahead of schedule, began taking up recommendations that would streamline support, education, training and medical services across the military branches.
‘Large muscle movements’The commission was moving next to the Air Force plan, much of which includes recommendations to shake up the Air National Guard, a highly controversial effort.
The Air Force also proposes closing both Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota and Cannon Air Force Base in New Mexico.
“We’re doing some very large muscle movements,” Gen. Gary Heckman, a top Air Force official who helped lead the service’s base-closing analysis team, said in an interview.
He said his service branch wasn’t hit in previous rounds of closures as hard as the Army and Navy because overhauling the Air Force’s structure — which is what has been proposed this time around — is very difficult.
Ellsworth’s proposed closing has caused the most political consternation because Sen. John Thune, a freshman senator, had argued during the 2004 campaign that he — rather his Democratic opponent, then-Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle — would be in a better position to save the facility. Nonetheless, it showed up on the Pentagon’s closure list.
Closing Cannon would cost Clovis, N.M., a small town on the Texas-New Mexico line, nearly 3,000 jobs.
Savings estimate:
$48.8 billion Overall, the Pentagon has proposed closing or consolidating a record 62 major military bases and 775 smaller installations to save $48.8 billion over 20 years, streamline the services and reposition the armed forces.
Since the Pentagon announced its proposal in May, commissioners had voiced concerns about several parts of it, including the estimate of how much money would be saved.
In some of its first decisions Wednesday, the commission voted to keep open several major Army and Navy bases that military planners want to shut down, including the Portsmouth shipyard in Kittery, Maine, and the New London submarine base in Groton, Conn., two of the Navy’s oldest bases.
“They have proved they are not a rubber stamp,” said David Berteau, a Pentagon official who oversaw base closings for the Pentagon in 1991 and 1993. “But we don’t know yet what the common theme is because they’re dealing with each of these on a case-by-case basis.”
Air Force biggest issueBy far, the most controversy — both on the commission and off — has surrounded the Air Force.
Most of its proposals cover the Air National Guard and would shift people, equipment and aircraft around at 54 or more sites where Guard units are stationed.
Aircraft would be taken away from 25 Air National Guard units. Instead of flying missions, those units would get other missions such as expeditionary combat support roles. They also would retain their state missions of aiding governors during civil disturbances and natural disasters.
Several states have sued to stop the shake-up, the commission itself has voiced concern that the plan would compromise homeland security, and the Justice Department was brought in to settle arguments over whether the Pentagon could relocate Air National Guard units without a governor’s consent. The ruling said it could.
The Pentagon says as a package, the Air Force proposals represent an effort to reshape the service branch into a more effective fighting force by consolidating both weapons systems and personnel, given that it will have a smaller but smarter aircraft fleet in the future.
© 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9071663/
